>>18340Ayn Rand is a retarded classcucked version of Max Stirner.
>"Oh we should all totally act in our own self-interest all the time">"Except when it conflicts with the captains of industry">muh virtuous job creator thank u for job>muh spooks>working class is actually obliged to absolutely not act at all in their own self-interest whatsoever as a resultNah, fuarrrk her. Her philosophy is not only universally ridiculed by anyone other than neckbeard lolbertardians, but her ideas themselves are wholly not in dialogue with literally any of the Western canon whatsoever. She at best gave a superficial reading of Nietzsche and Stirner and pulled her special snowflake philosophy out of her ass as a result of this.
People who are interested in Rand at all would do well to reader Stirner and get de-spooked.
>>18831Free will insofar as we can talk about it practically (metaphysically speaking, free will is one of the stupidest and most confused topics in all of philosophy that only intro students care about) is in no way incompatible with socialism. The opposite is true in fact.
>communism = Mao/Stalin/Deng/No, no, no, no.
None of them ever claimed to achieve communism. Communism is a very specific economic state of post-scarcity where the entire production process is automated. Socialism is the economic state of transition between capitalism and communism where the means of production are collectivized and managed by the workers, and arguably the majority of the so-called socialist/communist revolutions of the 20th century accomplished this. Catalonia and Free Territory Ukraine are anarchist exceptions to this that unfortunately made the mistake of thinking that the Bolsheviks were their allies.
These leaders were all Marxists-Leninists, and they were all soykaf .