q - questions and complaints

Any time ncl bans someone it's always for a logical reason. While he's a little more ban happy it's not a problem.

Not to mention rarely anyone is perma derezzed , most of the time it's just a kick

inb4 you accuse me of being ncl

>>7764
Doesn't mean that there shouldn't be set rules so that just in case the mod(s) having a bad day doesn't ban someone and not have to give a reason.

>>7767
Quis custodiet ipsos custodes

The IRC is chaos. It's comfy here. I don't see any reason to go on the IRC most of the time.

>>7779
where is he?

>>7780

Everywhere

Are we getting a loli board like 7chan? :DDDDDDDD

>>7790
No.

>>7772
fucking this
I thought someone had hax0red me

>>7747
I'm hesitant to call /pol/ "reactionary" (it's something of a buzzword these days, and most people there are just contrarians). I also don't think lainchan's admins (or even lainchan as a whole) should adopt any particular political leaning because it might make people who disagree with that leaning feel unwelcome.

That said, I am not in favor of adding a /pol/ board because, as you say, it really just attracts brewing soykaf and people being angry at each other. People shouldn't be pushed out because of their opinions (whatever those might be), they ought to be pushed out only if they act like buffoons, which /pol/ certainly does.

I really think a /pol/ board on lainchan would end up looking a lot like 8ch.net/leftypol/, rather than WN memesters.

>>7747
How can you be so blind as to see that the ruling classes are working to keep people fighting amongst themselves and then happily go to fight the reactionaries because they're tools of the ruling class? You must see that so long as you continue to fight amongst yourselves like this so are you. Put aside your fear. You know who your enemies are and it's not people on imageboards with differing political views.

>>7748
I agree that having lainchan take any particular official political stance (even if at this point it'd just reifying what's already pretty much a general consensus and what everyone already thinks of us) may not be a good idea, even if in my own personal political agenda I would like it due to the proliferation of reactionary ideology on the *chans the past few years.

It might be better to try to remain officially neutral and try not to attract nonfat-soykaf drinker s with political bullshit, but like it or not, everything is political.

>>7751
Reactionary proles are the useful idiotarians of the ruling class. Their ideology itself exists to divide the working class on the basis of race (Nazism), nationality (fascism in general), gender/sex (liberalism), or religion (conservatism) - broadly speaking, at least.

I agree with you that brewing soykaf on anonymous chinese shadow puppetry colloquiums about politics isn't that politically important, but if any sort of political action is taking place there are going to be reactionaries reacting against it (hence the name) by siding with the ruling class. That's why they're a problem.

Moreover, they're a problem on *chans because *chans are some of the few places left on the clearnet where user freedom is still generally respected. Perhaps I'm making too much out of it, but in my belief it is a great danger to free speech (much as I've come to loathe this meaningless meme term) to continue to let cancerous brewing soykaf reactionary ideologues infest the few places left on the clearnet with generally unrestricted discourse that also tend to have a good balance of usership and quality posts (on the smaller *chans at least).

>>7749
Yes but the problem with that is that 8/leftypol/ attracts a lot of /pol/yp nonfat-soykaf drinker s - which is why I would be a little worried about having a politics board here. Otherwise I'd be all for that.

>>7700
Can you ask Kalyx/Dark Engine/Petsu/Yukko/whoever to disable it on the irc?

>>7700
>>7701
why not just add it to vichan

>>7702
Yeah, it should be add to vichan instead of asking them to add disable function. But I'm busy to update my script. Though disable function will be needed eventually.

>>7701
There is no singular inline extension. It's a bunch of separate Javascript files.

>>7739
post-hover.js and show-backlinks.js, mate.

However I don't commit this project because I haven't used jQuery.

>>7110
what are you that guy who made that huge boohoo post about how people arent doing things how you want them to?

>>7110
that is true statistically and for me, but there are some actual punks

>>7633
uh, how?

>>7666
>uh, how?
looks like they disabled it for some reason

>>7633
What an ugly loli.

>>7726
personal preferences mane

>>7680
By that logic, why should the site have any javascript at all?

>>7681
I'm pretty sure the idea is that only one person has shown an interest in this feature so there isn't a whole lot of incentive to implement it
ultimately whoever wants to write a commit to the github can do so

that would be pretty nice actually. but seeing that we still have the double report bug and the reporting 504 error i doubt we'll have this done anytime soon.

If you know how go ahead and make\share a greasemonkey script. or start a thread on >>>/lam/ about it. maybe you could add it to lainchanX

https://github.com/Pashe/lainchanX

>>7679
this is actually really simple, with css alone:

.top,
.bottom {
 position: relative !important;
}
#thread {
 padding-top: 0;   
}
body {
    padding-bottom: 0;   
}

Post too long. Click here to view the full text.