>>20237No. Don't fall into this trap. Money and profit are the things they care about, not us. Hurting them there because that's where they feel it most is just spite. That said, it can still be a good place to hurt them just make sure you're not destroying actual value as you do so (i.e. burning a warehouse to the ground). That just hurts everyone in the long run.
Ways to do this include stealing, preferably stuff but money works too (generally quite risky though). Anything that increases their wage bill. Increasing other bills doesn't work so well, they just pay that bill to another corp anyway, but increasing their wages puts more money into peoples hands in the same way stealing it does.
Ultimately though you aren't going to hurt corporations that much like this. On the global scale they're shoving around trillions of dollars worth of stuff and it will take a lot of people to make a dent in that. When it starts happening on a larger scale the corporations will be in a position to respond and fairly efficiently protect themselves.
>>20282This is more likely to be impactful. Changing the general public opinion away from corporations hurts them as a whole far more than hitting their pocketbook, which only hurts them as individuals. Even if you dismantled Google this evening someone else would step up to fill their shoes. If you want to end this permanently you need to attack the concept itself. So long as people are willing to work for them and play their part in the collection of people that makes a corporation, there will be corporations.
