>>20020No offense but if they had you do multiple days of offsites that means you're a candidate they weren't sure about. I didn't find the interviews that difficult, they were pretty standard technical interviews even if they were very comprehensive and broad.
It's sort of irrelevant what experience you have, it's barely relevant for what you'd have to do at Google so it's not like you could have just skipped the interview process.
But on the other hand there is a fair deal of internal awareness that it favors people who can solve puzzles and probably excludes a lot of good devs.
>>20023This really couldn't be further from the truth. It's true that there's an air of being in an elite class by being a Googler, but there isn't any stratification internally. Nooglers aren't disrespected in any way.
Google is essentially an anarchist communist organization internally. They cultivate an atmosphere of everything being free except the few things that couldn't be (cluster quota, pretty much), and encourage employees to work on anything they think is interesting. There's a huge amount of internal mobility, because once you're a Googler, you're just a Googler, it's assumed you could have any role. I think their overt goal, even if not said in so many words, is to immediately get you up the pyramid of needs so that you can be not just maximally productive, but also maximally creative and inventive.
I can see how this looks like a cult, especially from a cynical perspective, but I actually think that the post-capitalism world will look a lot like Google, except without the separate slave class cooking the food and vacuuming the buildings.