>>21379>Nothing else even comes close because Tor is both the subject of massive amounts of research, and is developed by talented experts with great process and management.If nothing else ever gets visibility, nothing else will get researched. i2p has had a small amount of research and can benefit from some of Tor's research (
https://geti2p.net/en/research), but I agree that it is
not enough to be completely confident in the network.
>Virtually every Tor vulnerability you hear about is patched before you hear about it.But how long did an atacker know about it? A vulnerability is a vulnerability, regardless of how it quickly it gets patched. And addressing your point in
>>21288 about i2p being a nest of 0days, there are other,
non-java implementations, like i2pd. That being said, all software is going to have vulnerabilities, and neither of the networks is in a final state where problems cannot be fixed.
>that's entirely your own faultIt is, but unfortunately I cannot spend all my time at home reading about anonymity networks, although I would love to. I have other things to do in life, so I learn what I can when I can.
I'm not tryin
g to imply that you are a NEET who spends all day reading about Tor, and based on your level of knowledge it does not seem unlikely that someone would hire you for something.
>Did you read the papers I postedI have read what I could so far, but I had a final exam yesterday and I have another later today, so I have been focused on studying. I will read more when I get time.
Just to be clear, I'm not >>21312
if thats what you think.Clearly, you are very knowledgeable about Tor. Still, it's not perfect, and I suggest you read i2p's comparison between itself and Tor (
https://geti2p.net/en/comparison/tor) to see some benefits of i2p over Tor. It also gives benefits of Tor over i2p, but you seem to already be familiar with those. It will take you five minutes, and might help you see my perspective. Just to be clear, I'm not trying to say Tor os bad,
I use it frequently, I'm just trying to point out that i2p is not as terrible as you are trying to say it is.
>>21385You're right, I'm sorry. It was 4 a.m. when I wrote
>>21377 and I was tired. I will try not to let it happen again.
I'm surprised I and >>21379 have not both been derezzed .Anyways, I have a final to study for, and I think we could all use a break, so I'm going to leave this thread for a while. If you want to argue with this post, go ahead, but it will be a while before I respond.