cyb - cyberpunk

I use Byzantium Linux. Pretty fast, works great.

>>18297
Dabbled with cjdns for a while; the hyperboria network gets a lot of soykaf for not being very anonymous. Would be neat to pair it with a proxyham on public nodes and the like.

https://github.com/cjdelisle/cjdns
https://hyperboria.net/

I would like creating one for my friends to use as a network but I am probably the only of us who would use it.

>>18300
I didn't think that was active. Can you do a write up on it for the lain zine? I think that would be pretty sweet.

>>18363
>>18300
Published on July 23, 2013 Byzantium v0.5b

I think it is ded

Morphis is the most intriguing to me. the developer has great aspirations with the project and has already implemented pretty great code\UI he's been kind of away for a bit busy with uni but he says he'll be updating in December and is open to pull requests. This is a project that should be spread all over everywhere.

It deprecates pretty much everything we use from websites, email, irc, file uploads, video streaming all in a decentralized and encrypted fashion.

https://morph.is/v0.8/

>>18304
That's what I've been thinking of doing but I don't know if I could find anybody else that'd be interested.

>>18365
Looks interesting.

>>18300
>>18304

What did you use for hardware? Wifi with something to make it directional?

I was looking into this recently. What kind of complications do you run into with the FCC while broadcasting WiFi around your neighborhood?

>>18499
Would there be any problems? Unless you change the power output how is it any different from having wifi in your house?

>>18516
I guess that's what I'm curious about.. What sort of power you can legally put out

>>18516
>>18517
http://www.air802.com/files/FCC-Rules-and-Regulations.pdf

If you're not in the US, check your own local government's regulations on the ISM frequencies.

>>18297
does i2p count? I use that. its pretty comfy, if not a little web1.0
hoping it gains more use over time.

>>18304
What it is is very cool, but it not what the creators say it is.

The creators bill it as an encrypted meshnet. But it's actually a encrypted and distributed VPN, which is very cool. You could run it OVER a meshnet, but CJDNS itself has nothing to do with meshnets. It does not put your wifi cards in ad-hoc mode, it does not connect itself to other wifi devices it sees, I don't get why they bill it as a meshnet application. OLSR and BATMAN-ADV are meshnet things. CJDNS is not.

>>18499
>>18516
>>18517
>>18519
Pretty standard regulations are 1W EIRP for omnidirectional output and 4W EIRP for a directional antenna. In reality you can do whatever you want because it's Wifi and nobody gives a soykaf . If you have large or obvious antennas then you'll have problems with mentally ill people who believe the antenna is hurting them, and in those cases it's important to stay within regulations.

It's not good or practical to have one high power access point for the whole neighbourhood because every station would be talking over the others. You want a lot of lower power APs all connected together with hardlines. Operate them in WPA2-Enterprise mode with a dummy RADIUS server set to accept any credential. This way users of the community wireless network cannot snoop on each other without cracking the user's session key.

Sensitivity of your transceiver is more important that a big output power.

>>19716
>i2p
Not a Mesh net as such... more p2p. (although if able to be run over a meshnet that would be close to ideal).

Mesh net is networking without a central connection. i.e. no internet provider or telco. (wifi to wifi to wifi and on...)

Not played with it cus pleb. But looks interesting!
http://netsukuku.freaknet.org/

>>19762
Also may find interesting...
http://ipfs.io/#alpha-demo

>>19762
netsukuku has a numerical limit to it's own networks and I've never seen it work in action.
>>19716
No.
How in the fuarrrk have you become so misinformed as to think that I2P has anything to do with a Meshnet?